Tags

, , , ,

Proving once again that the Supreme Kangaroo Court justices only pretend to believe in the United States Constitution when striking down laws and amendments they don’t like regardless of constitutionality, six Injustices ruled that cops don’t need a warrant to search someone’s home, 4th Amendment be damned. You can read the majority opinion here.

Fourth-Amendment

Obviously these subhuman savages need to be impeached on the grounds that they have no power to rewrite the Constitution. They’ve done this time and time again, on everything from eminent domain (never mind that the big corporations who get to seize our property do nothing with it) to how presidents are chosen.

Article Five lays out quite clearly with whom the power to alter the Constitution lies:

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress; provided that no amendment which may be made prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any manner affect the first and fourth clauses in the ninth section of the first article; and that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate.

The Supreme Court cannot strike down parts of the Constitution, nor can it render amendments thereto null and void. The requirement of a warrant issued by a judge based on probable cause still stands, regardless of what the court says.

warrant

Advertisements